The argument posits that by leveraging core as a foundational model, one inherently trusts it to be a gold standard. This stance is further justified by highlighting that a significant portion of the network already operates under the assumption of being bug-compatible with core, suggesting a widespread acceptance or at least tolerance for any inherent flaws within the core system.

This discussion raises questions about the simplicity of such an approach. Is relying on core too straightforward a solution, overlooking potential complexities or pitfalls? The dialogue suggests a need for deeper analysis or consideration, implying that what seems like an uncomplicated solution might warrant further scrutiny in the context of software development practices, especially those concerning security and reliability in transaction processing.